![]() The essays in this important collection address specific themes at the cutting edge of recent Marxist scholarship. Keywords: Backhaus Colletti Hegelian systematic dialectic idealism International Symposium on Marxian Theory (ISMT) Marx-Hegel connection Ricardo For 150 years after the first edition of the first volume of Capital the 'translation' of Marx into Ricardo lost the essential Hegelian systematic dialectic so embedded in the book. Marx's capital as self-valorising value is confirmed as akin to Hegel's Absolute Idea, seeking to actualise itself while reproducing its own entire conditions of existence. The chapter considers Colletti's reading of Marx-Hegel, and also some converging considerations by Backhaus in his perspective on the dialectic of the form of value. The third step argues that it is exactly Hegel's idealism which made the Stuttgart philosopher crucial for the understanding of the capital relation. The second step reviews Marx's criticisms of Hegel and considers the debate within the International Symposium on Marxian Theory (ISMT). The first step, surveys the most relevant positions in shaping the writer's own views. This chapter deals in steps with the Marx-Hegel connection in Capital. 3, where Marx presents the synthetic development of the expression of value into the money-form. That explanation is actually contained in section. Those two questions are crucial for a proper comprehension of the dialectical structure of Marx's argument in Chapter 1 of Capital and, in particular, to clarify the determinate place where the unfolding of the explanation of the determinations of privately performed abstract labor as the substance of value is to be found. Furthermore, they have not paid sufficient attention to the specific form of the analytical process within dialectical thought, which distinguishes it from the kind of analysis characteristic of formal-logical methodologies. ![]() However, most works have not sufficiently thematized the peculiar role of the phase of analysis in Marx's dialectical investigation generally and in his presentation in particular. 10 or 15 years have witnessed a renewed interest in Marx's dialectical method and its implications for value theory. The final section illustrates recent developments of the connection, to which the current contributions are then related. After elucidating Marx’s own comments on Hegel’s importance to Marxism, the trajectory of the connection through the main Marxist thinkers can be established. To comprehend these developments fully, we need to return to the origins of the connection with Marx’s early involvement with the Young Hegelians. Appropriate and expunge have therefore been the two main responses to Hegel’s influence on Marxism, as we shall see. At the same time, however, there have been those who have sought to rupture this Hegel-Marx connection and purge Hegelianism from Marxism altogether. Marx’s main contribution, according to this view, was to demystify Hegel’s thought through a more materialist, dialectical approach. One pervasive theme, though, is the interpretation of Hegel’s idealist philosophy as being shrouded in mysticism. What will be discovered is that the nature of Marx’s comments on Hegel’s philosophy has left an ambiguous legacy. By delineating the main lines of the historical development of this connection this Introduction contextualises the more detailed contributions that follow. is not so much to express a relationship as to raise a problem - one of the most challenging problems in the history of thought.’1 Without doubt, this ‘problem’ of connecting Hegel and Marx has been recurrent within Marxist discourse from the end of the nineteenth century to the present.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |